| Article | Laura Nuņo de la Rosa, Becoming Organisms. The Organisation of Development and the Development of Organisation | Abstract | Despite the radical importance of embryology in the development of organicism,
developmental biology remains philosophically underexplored as a theoretical and
empirical resource to clarify the nature of organisms. This paper discusses how embryology
can help develop the organisational definition of the organism as a differentiated, functionally
integrated, and autonomous system. I distinguish two conceptions of development in
the organisational tradition that yield two different conceptions of the organism: the lifehistory
view claims that organisms can be considered as such during their whole ontogeny;
the constitutive view distinguishes two periods in the life history, a period of generation and
a period of self-maintenance of a constitutive organisation. Arguing in favour of the constitutive
view, it will be claimed that the organisational criteria for the definition of organism
(i.e., differentiation, functional integration, and autonomy) can only be applied to the
developmental system when it has entered the period of self-maintenance of a constitutive
organisation. Under the light of current research in developmental biology, it is possible
to make explicit how organisms come to be as organisms. To this end, I explore key ontogenetic
events that help us clarify the core aspects of animal organisation and allow us to
identify the developmental stage that marks the ontological transition between an organism
in potency and an organism in actuality. The structure of this ontogenetic unfolding parallels
the conceptual structure of the very notion of organism; the generation of the being of
a particular organism parallels its definition.
| Keywords | Organicism, development, morphogenesis, functional integration, autonomy | please login to download article | | Back to Contents >> | | Back to Home >> |
|
|
| For Subscription Information - Click Here | | Publications : | | Vol. 34, no. 4 (2012) | | Vol. 34, no. 3 (2012) | | Vol. 34, no. 1-2 (2012) | | Vol. 33, no. 4 (2011) | | Vol. 33, no. 3 (2011) | | Vol. 33, no. 2 (2011) | | Vol. 33, no. 1 (2011) | | Vol. 32, no. 4 (2010) | | Vol. 32, no. 2-3 (2010) | | Vol. 32, no. 1 (2010) | | Vol. 31, no. 3-4 (2009) | | Vol. 31, no. 2 (2009) | | Vol. 31, no. 1 (2009) | | Vol. 30, no. 3-4 (2008) | | Vol. 30, no. 2 (2008) | | Vol. 30, no. 1 (2008) | | Vol. 29, no. 4 (2007) | | Vol. 29, no. 3 (2007) | | Vol. 29, no. 2 (2007) | | Vol. 29, no. 1 (2007) | | Vol. 28, no. 4 (2006) | | Vol. 28, no. 3 (2006) | | Vol. 28, no. 2 (2006) | | Vol. 28, no. 1 (2006) | | Vol. 27, no. 3-4 (2005) | | Vol. 27, no. 2 (2005) | | Vol. 27, no. 1 (2005) |
|