| Article | Johannes Martens, Organisms in Evolution | Abstract | Organisms constitute one of the most remarkable features of our living world.
However, they have not yet received any accepted characterization within the framework
of the evolutionary theory. The reasons for this contrast between the saliency of organisms
in the biological landscape and their theoretical status are multiple and they are analyzed in
the first part of this paper. Starting from this contrast, I argue for a theoretically grounded
concept of organism within the framework of evolutionary theory itself. To this effect I
argue that the theory of major transitions in evolution (Maynard Smith and Szathmáry
1995; Michod 1999) provides us with the theoretical basis for an understanding of the
individuality of organisms and I propose a first characterization of organisms as evolutionary
units structured by a division of reproductive labor among their parts. I also discuss one
of the most important implications of this definition, namely that some colonial entities are
to be counted as superorganisms. Finally, I show that though theoretically satisfying, this
definition does not suffice in order fully to individuate the organisms and superorganisms
in practice. To this end, physiology is needed, because it offers us some criteria for their
individuation in ecological space. These criteria, however, are not immune to errors through
misidentification and their shortcomings are discussed in the last section. In conclusion, I
emphasize the positive implications of these criteria concerning the ecological significance
of organisms.
| Keywords | Organism, superorganism, evolutionary transition, extended physiology | please login to download article | | Back to Contents >> | | Back to Home >> |
|
|
| For Subscription Information - Click Here | | Publications : | | Vol. 34, no. 4 (2012) | | Vol. 34, no. 3 (2012) | | Vol. 34, no. 1-2 (2012) | | Vol. 33, no. 4 (2011) | | Vol. 33, no. 3 (2011) | | Vol. 33, no. 2 (2011) | | Vol. 33, no. 1 (2011) | | Vol. 32, no. 4 (2010) | | Vol. 32, no. 2-3 (2010) | | Vol. 32, no. 1 (2010) | | Vol. 31, no. 3-4 (2009) | | Vol. 31, no. 2 (2009) | | Vol. 31, no. 1 (2009) | | Vol. 30, no. 3-4 (2008) | | Vol. 30, no. 2 (2008) | | Vol. 30, no. 1 (2008) | | Vol. 29, no. 4 (2007) | | Vol. 29, no. 3 (2007) | | Vol. 29, no. 2 (2007) | | Vol. 29, no. 1 (2007) | | Vol. 28, no. 4 (2006) | | Vol. 28, no. 3 (2006) | | Vol. 28, no. 2 (2006) | | Vol. 28, no. 1 (2006) | | Vol. 27, no. 3-4 (2005) | | Vol. 27, no. 2 (2005) | | Vol. 27, no. 1 (2005) |
|